Territorial Bloggings
A Cogent Mélange of Lutheran & Pop-Culture Punditry
The Pretentious Apprentice
I haven’t written about the Fall TV season’s reality shows. I’ve enjoyed them all, but I just haven’t felt the need to express my opinions about what was happening. That was in spite of the fact that there was a whole lot of good & fun to watch stuff happening on Survivor: Guatemala, The Amazing Race: Family Edition, and The Apprentice 4. There were people/teams to love (the Linzes & Bransens on TAR), and villains aplenty (the Weavers on TAR, Judd on Survivor, and Alla on The Apprentice). Just nothing that made me feel like writing.
That continued through the finales of Survivor, where Danni’s win was a deserved one (even though I think Stephenie played a slightly better game), and TAR where the Linzes were fabulously deserving winners (though I would’ve been quite ok with the Bransens winning - just so long as the horridly hypocritical Weavers didn’t win!). In fact, I was looking forward to a relatively easy/pleasant viewing of the Apprentice finale last night, mainly because both Randal and Rebecca were such likable & worth finalists.
Little did I know that the Apprentice finale would be the one that caused me to finally write… ![]()
At this point, let me defer to one of my favorite reality recappers, over at Reality News Online, Betsy Wasser, who concluded her recap of the finale thusly:
Randal is hired.
Randal jumps out of his chair in triumph and goes to shake hands with the other candidates. But wait! There’s more! Trump asks Randal to sit back down, and the music stops just in time, leading me to believe Trump had this trick up his sleeve before this moment. This would be the point that many of my readers predicted. In a season marked by multiple firings, Trump will end with a multiple hiring, offering a job to Rebecca as well.
Trump says that he’s thinking about hiring Rebecca too, and wants Randal’s opinion. Randal says that while she’s good, the name of the show is The Apprentice, not The Apprentii, so there should be only one. Okay, Trump says. He was thinking about hiring Rebecca, but now he won’t. Randal continues to celebrate as the credits roll.
What the hell was that? Randal has been saying all along that Rebecca is a worthy oppontent, and that he respects her and thinks she’s talented. But he doesn’t want Trump to give her a job. Not because she’s not good enough, but because he doesn’t want to share the glory? And Trump decides to take the advice from someone who has worked for him for less time than it takes to pour a cup of coffee? That’s pitiful. This doesn’t have to be a zero sum “I win, you lose†game for Randal. He’d still have the job he wanted, and he’d still be Trump’s first choice, but Rebecca would have a great opportunity as well. Yet Randal refuses to share even a little bit of the glory. In that very quick moment, I was no longer able to feel as happy for Randal. This really ended things on a sour note, and I’m disappointed.
I agree. I was aghast at how selfishly & gracelessly Randal handled that opportunity. IMO, he took all the goodwill that he had banked over the course of the season, including his rep as a truly nice guy, and flushed it right down the crapper. He acted like a selfish, cutthroat, arrogant prick.
He had already won. Trump made the choice — Randal was the best. The first choice got job of his choice. He was then given an opportunity to be gracious — in a way that would have only burnished his status, and IN NO WAY would’ve EVER diminished his status as the “Apprentice.”
If the goal of the show/job-interview was truly to get to work for Trump, then Randal achieved that goal. Now, if the goal is to hog all the glory to yourself, no matter how classlessly you have to act to do it… well, then I guess Randal achieved that goal too. During a process in which Randal had consistently raised himself above the fray, he ultimately sullied his accomplishment by lowering himself to Alla’s petty, vindictive level.
And that’s sad.
-ghp



3 Comments so far ...
I just exercised the editorial oversight that comes with the being the sole proprietor of this blog. More specifically, I deleted the first comment that had been submitted to this posting.
Why? Well, I don’t think that it was spam, although it could’ve been; rather, I deleted it because the commenter took things in a direction that I didn’t approve — i.e., racism.
I don’t think that race played ANY role in what happened with Randal’s decision to not encourage Trump to hire Rebecca. NO ROLE WHATSOEVER!
As such, I don’t want a comment here that totally takes my posting in a wrong/mistaken/ignorant direction. I apologize up front, if it turns out that my deleting the comment was an error; however, I am far more comfortable erring on the side of caution.
Besides, Territorial Bloggings is my personal fiefdom, NOT a democracy.
Explanation over.
-ghp
Comment on December 17, 2005 01:23 pmPer MSNBC.com, what Trump said was, “If you were me, would you hire Rebecca also?â€
Now, IMO, that is the important, and telling, question — and the question which Randal botched.
The earlier, hypothetical, question (to which you, I think, are referring) was asked & answered before the final judgement was made. Why did Randal hesitate to answer this hypothetical? I would think that it was driven more by his reluctance to give the real answer (i.e., “yes”) at a time when he felt it could hurt his chances (i.e., prior to the final hiring decision). Randal was under fire in a way that I don’t think he ever expected — i.e., for the first time he might have actually felt that his victory was truly in jeopardy. (I disagree, but then I can’t really blame him, as I think Rebecca really did outperform him on the final task…).
Anyway, in the final analysis it doesn’t matter all that much. Randal got that which he so obviously coveted, and Rebecca will get something equally as good, if not better.
And we all get to argue about it!
Comment on December 19, 2005 05:58 pm-ghp
Thanks for quoting me, Glen!
Comment on December 20, 2005 12:46 pm