Let’s Go Red Wings

May 20, 2008 · Filed Under general · Comments 
No Gravatar

NHL_SC_Finals_2008

Let’s Go Red Wings!

Crosby & Malkin?

Bring ‘em on!

I’ll take the Wings’ top two of Zetterberg & Datsyuk.

Not to mention Holmstrom, Lidstrom, Franzen, Hudler, Kronwall, Rafalski, Samuelsson, Filppula, & Osgood.

I think this has all the earmarks of a great series. That said. The Wings will prevail in 7. Ozzy will be the MVP & Lidstrom will be the first European born Captain to hoist the Cup.

Here’s the full Stanley Cup TV Schedule:
May 24 Game 1: Penguins @ Red Wings - VERSUS
May 26 Game 2: Penguins @ Red Wings - VERSUS
May 28 Game 3: Red Wings @ Penguins - NBC
May 31 Game 4: Red Wings @ Penguins - NBC
June 2 *Game 5: Penguins @ Red Wings - NBC
June 4 *Game 6: Red Wings @ Penguins - NBC
June 7 *Game 7: Penguins @ Red Wings - NBC
* If Necessary

-ghp

Tags: , , , ,

Honoring Yzerman

January 2, 2007 · Filed Under general · Comments 
No Gravatar

926

[Edited 070103, after the ceremony & game]
Steve Yzerman’s number 19 was retired by the Red Wings Tuesday night. It joined the 5 legendary numbers previously retired by the Red Wings (shown above — to be followed, I would wager by Nick Lidstrom’s number 5 within the decade…).

The coverage at the two Detroit newspapers (the News & Free Press) will be more than thorough, but an article over at ESPN.com really does a great job of illustrating why Steve Yzerman is held in such high esteem by the folks of Metro Detroit & Wings fans everywhere. The Captain wasn’t just a great hockey player - that alone wouldn’t generate the affection that he receives.

Nope, he’s just a great guy. Decent & honest. A good man.

That’s why he’s beloved.

Additional coverage can also be found at DetroitHockey.net and Detroit Red Wings.com

-ghp

Tags: , , ,

Realignment expectations

December 22, 2006 · Filed Under general · Comments 
No Gravatar

Just last night I was thinking about the NHL, and more specifically about how it’s a travesty that the Red Wings are in the Western Conference even though Detroit is obviously in the Eastern time zone. I was also thinking about how so many hockey pundits wail & moan about how to "fix" the NHL, when one of the most obvious problems is that there are too many teams. So, as I drifted off to sleep, I thought about how I’d fix things via contraction & realignment.

Then, just a little bit ago, I visited ESPN.com and saw the article on how the NHL is considering another realignment, shifting from the current 6 division (3 in each conference) structure to a more sensible (IMO) 4 division (2 in each conf.) structure. You can read more about the proposal here. Among the stated goals of any realignment are to develop more consistent rivalries, minimize time-zone disruptions (thus benefiting television ratings), & decrease travel costs (fiscal and physical). I agree with these goals, and I would even take a few additional steps. More specifically:

  • Contraction - there are too many teams (30). Expansion has outstripped even the infusion of the best Russian & European talent over the past 15-20 years. The NHL does not need a presence in hot-weather, Southern US cities. It just doesn’t. Especially with the advent of satellite TV (NHL Center Ice!) & the ‘net, which make it quite easy to follow your favorite team from anywhere in the country. A greater concentration of talent, which will result from contracting 6 teams, will raise the quality of play, making games more watchable & entertaining. So, I would say goodbye (and good riddance) to: Anaheim, Atlanta, Florida, Phoenix, Los Angeles, & Tampa Bay.

  • Realignment - I would have two conferences, each made up of two 6-team divisions:
    • Eastern Conference - North Division: Boston, Buffalo, Detroit, Montreal, Ottawa, Toronto
    • Eastern Conference - South Division: Carolina, New Jersey, NY Islanders, NY Rangers, Philadelphia, Washington
    • Western Conference - North Division: Chicago, Columbus, Dallas, Minnesota, Nashville, St. Louis
    • Western Conference - South Division: Calgary, Colorado, Edmonton, Portland, San Jose, Vancouver (Note: Portland is relocated from Pittsburgh, as Pittsburgh seems bound & determined to drive the Penguins out of town…)

  • Schedule - Big picture, there would be an unbalanced 76 game schedule, consisting of:
    • 12 games - Rotating Home & Home vs. one division from the "other" conference (sort of like baseball rotates non-rival interleague play).
    • 24 games - 2 Home & Home vs. the "other" division’s teams.
    • 40 games - 4 Home & Home vs. the 5 divisional rivals.

  • Playoffs - I would make the following adjustments, based on the idea that regular playoff tilts are the foundation for bitter rivalries:
    • The top 4 teams from each division make the playoffs (i.e., 16 out of the 24 teams).
    • Round 1 is divisional, with teams ranked 1 through 4 - this is where bitterness can be bred!
    • Round 2 would see the 4 winners re-seeded based on regular season conference finish, thus minimizing divisional inequities & the chance for anti-climactic conference finals.
    • Round 3 would be the normal conference finals.
    • Round 4 would be the normal Stanley Cup Finals.

    The combination of a regular season focus on playing the same teams (while maintaining a reasonable sense of geography, time-zone, and history), a hearkening back to the divisional playoffs structure that made rivalries in the 80’s so special, and contraction (which will strengthen the talent pool & retrench the league in more sustainable, hockey-friendly areas) would go a long way towards getting the NHL back to it’s rightful place as a major North American sport.

    -ghp

    Tags: , , , ,